"'In Your Shoes Day" ovvero "Prove di Dhimmitudine"

No, non servono concorsi o sondaggi, ormai è definitivo: la polizia britannica si conferma come la più stupida d'Europa. Tuttavia è doveroso ammettere che non ha incontrato notevoli difficoltà per giungere a questo primato: ha un valido riferimento nel partito che governa il Paese, che da anni non ha pari in Europa, quanto a serbatoio di eccellentissimi idioti.

Leggi: "Sheffeld police officers dressed as muslim"

Vogliamo un mondo laico e libero o un mondo musulmano? 2- Sharia in Action

Gates of Vienna riporta il il link di un filmato girato da una emittente televisiva danese che mostra a quale livello di atrocità può arrivare la sub-umanità maomettana in Pakistan, ma non illudiamoci: ciò vale per qualunque altro Paese dove alla ragione subentra la barbarie di una ideologia generata da una civiltà minore e primitiva.

Per contro, l’occidente che è figlio della Ragione, sembra invece ripudiare le sue origini e accogliere a braccia aperte la bestialità musulmana.

Abbiamo visto come ad esempio nel Regno Unito si perseguiti chi denuncia le aberrazioni di una classe politica ottusa che si cala le braghe di fronte all’invasore maomettano; ma ogni giorno constatiamo che nei Paesi occidentali dominati dalla logica della “political correctness”, si tollera che attecchisca e si diffonda il cancro musulmano che ha l’unico scopo di spegnere quel lume della ragione e gettare la nostra società evoluta nel baratro dell’oscurantismo 1).
Chi crede nella laicità dello stato, nella democrazia e nella libertà ha il diritto/dovere di opporsi a questo flagello, contrastando innanzitutto le sciagurate e complici politiche multiculturali.

1) leggi: The Jihad fanatic peddling a message of hate to 11-year-old Londoners (funded by the taxpayer) - Gran Bretagna, la sharia è legge I tribunali islamici già al lavoro -

Gates of Vienna, per una sorta di pudore che non mi sento di condividere, ha deciso di non pubblicare il video, ma soltanto il collegamento. Come vedete sul blu-blog il filmato c’è, perché chiunque passi da qui non dovrebbe scandalizzarsi, ma reagire, denunciare, diffondere e casomai provare scandalo e vergogna se fatti di questo genere vengono nascosti o “passati” in tono minore.

Gentili Signore ed Egregi Signori di questo Occidente alla frutta: questi sono i musulmani che accogliamo, rendetevene conto.

Leggi anche: A Londra, città meticcia, arriva il delitto d'onore -
La legge della Sharia anche in Olanda: posti in teatro solo per donne - France creeps toward sharia – convicts Brigitte Bardot for insulting Muslims, again. - Non muslims female british police issued veils.

Lionheart
by Lionheartuk

"Is it any wonder the British State is losing the War against Islamic extremism when they don't arreste them and pull them in prison.

Instead they arrest a Christian Blogger talking about this War in His own way"

Non diamo spazio agli imbecilli.

Diciamolo, provo un malcelato disprezzo (e disgusto) per quel branco di imbecilli che in Italia (dell'Europa parleremo dopo) accusano il governo di xenofobia e razzismo perché, con ritardo, ha deciso di avvalersi di alcuni provvedimenti diretti ad impedire che il nostro Paese venga invaso da migliaia e migliaia di immigranti clandestini.

Il fastidio aumenta in modo preoccupante, quando ascolto o leggo le dichiarazioni di quei coglioni che, convinti che la stragrande maggioranza degli italiani sia composta da poveri fessi, insistono su alcune tesi decisamente discutibili.

Esempio:

• LORO - tra i clandestini che rifiutiamo vi sono di certo delle menti eccelse che potrebbero essere indispensabili per l'Italia;
• FOSCA - ma come no? Tuttavia fino ad ora pare che nessun genio sia ancora approdato sulle nostre coste. Per contro, il Capo della Polizia afferma che la percentuale dei clandestini che incorre in reati vari parte dal 60% ed arriva fino all'80% in certe zone del Paese, ma c'è di più: a fronte di un 7% di popolazione straniera in Italia, il 38% dei detenuti nelle carceri italiane è costituito da immigrati, mentre è del 40% (quarantapercento) la percentuale delle violenze sulle donne commesse da stranieri-
• LORO -non ospitando quei clandestini li condanniamo alla morte (questa è di 2 giorni fa);
  
• FOSCA - che schifo! Come al solito, questa sinistra bugiarda e ipocrita si avvale di mezzucci vergognosi per raggiungere i suoi obbiettivi, ulteriori commenti sono inutili.
  
• LORO - viviamo già in una società multiculturale e la molteplicità delle culture rappresenta un valore che ci arricchisce.
• FOSCA - un valore che ci arricchisce? magari fosse così. Ma guardiamo in faccia la realtà: gli immigrati che provengono dai Paesi di religione islamica sono pregni di quella cultura barbara, retrograda che impedisce loro di accettare la nostra moderna, laica cultura liberale. Pensate forse che quei popoli così diversi dal nostro, che vivono osservando precetti e principi che noi abbiamo cancellato da secoli, abbiano qualcosa da insegnare? Io non lo credo. Tuttavia, non mi aspetto che gli immigrati contribuiscano allo sviluppo della nostra civiltà, ma pretendo che rispettino i valori fondamentali del Paese che li ospita. Pretendo che gli immigrati si integrino completamente nella nostra società e diventino italiani a tutti gli effetti (come sono diventati argentini, australiani, americani, i nostri emigranti.) Purtroppo, causa la loro "islamicità", questa è e sarà sempre una realtà inattuabile.
  
• Per contro, gli immigranti non musulmani, pur non apportando altro valore aggiunto che la loro volontà di realizzarsi nel lavoro, possono integrarsi completamente nel tessuto civile e sociale del nostro Paese, ma spetta a noi aiutarli in questo processo.
  
• Ne riparleremo, magari con riferimento all'immigrazione romena.
  

In alcuni sfortunati Paesi europei, gli imbecilli multiculturalisti colleghi di quelli italiani, hanno avuto il campo libero, favorendo in un primo tempo l'immigrazione dei popoli di origine musulmana, quindi assecondando le loro assurde pretese . Ora i loro concittadini ne subiscono le conseguenze e, a mio parere, muoiono dalla voglia di ringraziarli.

Speriamo che il nostro governo prosegua sul cammino della continenza del fenomeno dell'immigrazione che comunque dovrà essere necessariamente legata alla certa integrazione degli stranieri nella società italiana. Nel contempo si comprenda che l'immigrazione dei popoli musulmani deve essere fermata, prima che sia troppo tardi.

Di seguito posto un articolo di Giulio Meotti già riportato da Liberali per Israele, ma per gli amici stranieri, questa volta in lingua inglese.

In the casbah of Rotterdam

by Giulio Meotti


In Feyenoord, veiled women can be seen everywhere, darting like a flash through the streets of the neighborhood. They avoid any sort of contact, even eye contact, especially with men. Feyenoord is the size of a city, and there are seventy nationalities coexisting there. It is an area that lives on subsidies and residential construction, and it is here that it is most obvious that Holland – with all of its rules against discrimination and all of its moral indignation – is a completely segregated society. Rotterdam is new, having been bombed twice by the Luftwaffe during the second world war. Like Amsterdam, it is below sea level, but unlike the capital it does not enjoy an image of reckless abandon. In Rotterdam, it is the Arab shops selling halal food that dominate the cityscape, not the neon lights of the prostitutes. Everywhere are casbah-cafes, travel agencies offering flights to Rabat and Casablanca, posters expressing solidarity with Hamas, or offering affordable Dutch language lessons.

It is the second-largest city in the country, a poor city, but also the economic engine with its huge port, the most important in Europe. Most of the population are immigrants, and the city has the tallest and most imposing mosque in Europe. Sixty percent of the foreigners who arrive in Holland come here to live. The most striking thing when one arrives in the city by train are the enormous and fascinating mosques framed by the vibrant green, luxuriant, wooded, watery countryside, like an alien presence compared to the rest. They call it "Eurabia." The Turkish Mevlana mosque is imposing. It has the tallest minarets in Europe, even higher than the stadium of the Feyenoord soccer team.

Many of the neighborhoods in Rotterdam are captive to the darkest, most violent form of Islamism. Pim Fortuyn's house stands out like a pearl in a sea of chador and niqab. It is at number 11 Burgerplein, behind the train station. Every now and then someone comes to put flowers in front of the home of the professor who was murdered in Amsterdam on May 6, 2002. Someone else leaves a card: "In Holland everything is tolerated, except for the truth." A millionaire named Chris Tummesen bought Pim Fortuyn's house so that it would remain intact. The evening before his murder Pim was nervous, and had said on television that a climate of demonization had been created against him and his ideas. And his fears came true, when he was shot in the head five times by Volkert van der Graaf, a militant of the animal rights left, scrawny, head shaved, eyes dark, dressed like an environmental purist in a handmade shirt, sandals, and goat's wool socks, a strict vegetarian, "a guy impatient to change the world," his friends say.

Not long ago in downtown Rotterdam, funerary photos of Geert Wilders were placed under a tree, with a candle to commemorate his upcoming death. Today Wilders is the most popular politician in the city. He is the heir of Fortuyn, the homosexual, Catholic, ex-Markist professor who had formed his own party to save the country from Islamization. At his funeral, only the absence of Queen Beatrice kept the farewell to the "divine Pim" from becoming a funeral fit for a king. Before his death they made a monster of him (one Dutch minister called him an "untermensch," an inferior man in Nazi parlance), afterward they idolized him. The prostitutes of Amsterdam left a wreath of flowers in his honor beneath the National Monument in Dam Square, a memorial to the victims of World War II.

Three months ago, "The Economist," a weekly publication far from Wilders' anti-Islamic ideas, spoke of Rotterdam as a "Eurabian nightmare." For most of the Dutch who live there, Islamism is now a threat greater than the Delta Plan, the complicated system of dikes that prevents flooding from the sea, like the flood in 1953 that killed two thousand people. The picturesque town of Schiedam, part of the greater Rotterdam area, has always been a jewel in the Dutch imagination. Then the fairy tale glow faded, when in the newspapers three years ago it became the city of Farid A., the Islamist who made death threats against Wilders and Somali dissident Ayaan Hirsi Ali. For six years, Wilders has lived under 24-hour police protection.

Muslim lawyers in Rotterdam also want to change the rules of the courtroom, asking to be allowed to remain seated when the judge enters. They recognize Allah alone. The lawyer Mohammed Enait recently refused to stand when the magistrates enter the courtroom, saying that "Islam teaches that all men are equal." The court of Rotterdam has recognized Enait's right to remain seated: "There is no legal obligation requiring Muslim lawyers to stand in front of the court, insofar as this action is in contrast with the dictates of the Islamic faith." Enait, the head of the legal office Jairam Advocaten, has explained that "he considers all men equal, and does not acknowledge any form of deference toward anyone." All men, but not all women. Enait is well known for his refusal to shake hands with women, and has repeatedly said he would prefer them to wear the burqa. And there are many burqas on the streets of Rotterdam.

The fact that Eurabia has arrived in Rotterdam has been demonstrated by an episode in April at the Zuidplein Theatre, one of the most prestigious in the city, a modernist theater proud of "representing the cultural diversity of Rotterdam." It is located in the southern part of the city, and receives funding from the municipality, headed by a Muslim, the son of the imam Ahmed Aboutaleb. Three weeks ago, the Zuidplein Theatre allowed an entire balcony to be reserved for women only, in the name of sharia. This is not happening in Pakistan or in Saudi Arabia, but in the city from which the Founding Fathers set out for the United States. It was from here that the Puritans disembarked in the Speedwell, which they later exchanged for the Mayflower. This is where the American adventure began. Today, it has legalized sharia.

For a performance by the Muslim Salaheddine Benchikhi, the Zuidplein Theatre agreed to his request to have the first five rows set aside for women only. Salaheddine, an editorialist for the website Morokko.nl, is known for his opposition to the integration of Muslims. The city council has approved this: "According to our Western values, the freedom to live one's own life by virtue of one's convictions is a precious possession." A spokesman for the theater has also defended the director: "It is hard to get Muslims to come to the theater, so we are willing to adapt."

Another man who has been willing to adapt is the director Gerrit Timmers. His words are fairly symptomatic of what Wilders calls "self-Islamization." The first case of self-censorship took place in Rotterdam, in December of 2000. Timmers, the director of the theater group Onafhankelijk Toneel, wanted to stage a performance about the life of Mohammed's wife Aisha. The play was boycotted by the Muslim actors in the company when it became evident that it would be a target for the Islamists. "We are enthusiastic about the play, but fear reigns," the actors told him. The composer, Najib Cherradi, said that he would withdraw "for the good of my daughter." The newspaper "Handelsblad" gave the story the title "Tehran on the Meuse," the name of the gentle river that passes through Rotterdam. "I had already done three works about the Moroccans, so I wanted to have Muslim actors and singers," Timmers tells us. "Then they told me that it was a dangerous issue, and they could not participate, because they had received death threats. In Rabat, an article came out saying we would end up like Salman Rushdie. For me, it was more important to continue the dialogue with the Moroccans, rather than provoke them. For this reason, I see no problem if the Muslims want to separate the men from the women in a theater."

Let's meet the director who has brought sharia to the Dutch theaters, Salaheddine Benchikhi. He is young, modern, confident, and speaks perfect English. "I defend the decision to separate the men from the women, because here there is freedom of expression and organization. If people can't sit where they want to, that is discrimination. There are two million Muslims in Holland, and they want our tradition to become public, everything is evolving. Mayor Aboutaleb has supported me."

One year ago, the city was buzzing when the newspapers published a letter by Bouchra Ismaili, a Rotterdam city councilman: "Listen up, crazy freaks, we're here to stay. You're the foreigners here, with Allah on my side I'm not afraid of anything. Take my advice: convert to Islam, and you will find peace." Just a walk through the streets of the city, and you know right away that in many neighborhoods you are no longer in Holland. It is right out of the Middle East. In some schools, there is a "room of silence" where Muslim students, who are in the majority, can pray five times a day, with a poster of Mecca, the Qur'an, and a ritual washing before the prayers. Another Muslim city councilman, Brahim Bourzik, wants signs placed in various parts of the city showing the direction to Mecca.

Sylvain Ephimenco is a Franco-Dutch journalist who has been living in Rotterdam for twelve years. For twenty years, he was the "Libération" correspondent in Holland, and is proud of his leftist credentials. "Even though I don't believe in that anymore," he says, welcoming us to his home overlooking one of Rotterdam's little canals. Not far from here is the al Nasr mosque of the imam Khalil al Moumni, who when gay marriage was legalized described homosexuals as "sick people worse than pigs." From the outside, it can be seen that the mosque is more than twenty years old, having been built by the first Moroccan immigrants. Moumni has written a pamphlet that is circulating around the Dutch mosques, "The path of the Muslim," in which he explains that the heads of homosexuals should be cut off and "hung from the highest building in the city." Next to the al Nasr mosque, we sit down at a cafe for men only. In front of us is a halal Islamic slaughterhouse. Ephimenco is the author of three essays on Holland and Islam, and today is a famous columnist for the leftist Christian newspaper "Trouw." He has the best perspective for understanding a city that, perhaps even more than Amsterdam, embodies the tragedy of Holland.

"It is not at all true that Wilders gets his votes from the fringes, everyone knows that, even though they don't say it," he tells us. "Today educated people vote for Wilders, although at first it was the lower class Dutch, the tattoo crowd. Many academics and people on the left vote for him. The problem is all of these Islamic headscarves. There's a supermarket behind my house. When I arrived, there wasn't a single headscarf. Now it's all Muslim women with the chador at the register. Wilders is not Haider. His positions are on the right, but also on the left, he's a typical Dutchman. Here there are even hours at the swimming pool set aside for Muslim women. This is the origin of the vote for Wilders. Islamization, this foolishness with the theater, has to be stopped. In Utrecht, there is a mosque where they provide separate city services for men and women. The Dutch are afraid. Wilders is against the Frankenstein of multiculturalism. I, who used to be on the left but am no longer anything, I say we've reached the limit. I feel the ideals of the Enlightenment have been betrayed with this voluntary apartheid, in my heart I feel the death of the ideals of the equality of men and women, and freedom of expression. Here the left is conformist, and the right has the better answer to insane multiculturalism."

One of the professors at Erasmus University in Rotterdam is Tariq Ramadan, the famous Swiss Islamic scholar who is also a special adviser for the city. Some of Ramadan's statements against homosexuality were uncovered by Holland's most famous gay magazine, "Gay Krant," directed by a talkative journalist named Henk Krol. On a videocassette, Ramadan calls homosexuality "a disease, a disorder, an imbalance." On the tape, Ramadan also has comments on women, "they should keep their eyes on the ground when they're on the street." Wilders' party asked for the city council to be disbanded, and for the Islamic scholar from Geneva to be sent packing, but instead he was renewed in his post for two more years. This was happening while across the sea, the Obama administration was confirming the ban on Ramadan entering United States territory. The tapes in Krol's possession include one in which Ramadan tells women: "Allah has an important rule: if you try to attract attention through the use of perfume, or your appearance or gestures, you do not have the correct spiritual orientation."

"When Pim Fortuyn was killed, it was a shock for everyone, because a man was murdered for what he said," Krol tells us. "That was no longer my country. I'm still thinking about leaving Holland, but where can I go? Here we have been criticized by everyone, by the Catholic Church and by the Protestants. But when we criticized Islam, they answered us: you are creating new enemies!" According to Ephimenco, the street is the secret of Wilders' success: "In Rotterdam, there are three enormous mosques, one of them is the largest in Europe. There are more and more Islamic headscarves, and an Islamist impulse coming from the mosques. I know many people who have left the city center to go to the rich, white suburbs. My neighborhood is poor and black. It is a question of identity, on the streets Dutch is not spoken anymore, but Arabic and Turkish."

Let's meet the man who inherited Fortuyn's column in the newspaper "Elsevier." His name is Bart Jan Spruyt, a robust young Protestant intellectual, founder of the Edmund Burke Society, but above all the author of Wilders' "Declaration of independence," and his coworker from the beginning. "Here an immigrant no longer has to struggle, study, work, he can live at the expense of the state," Spruyt tells us. "We have ended up creating a parallel society. The Muslims are in the majority in many neighborhoods, and are asking for sharia. This isn't Holland anymore. Our use of freedom has turned back against us, it is a process of self-Islamization."

Spruyt was one of Fortuyn's close friends. "Pim said what the people had known for decades." He attacked the establishment and the journalists. It was a great relief for the people when he went into politics, they called him the 'white knight'. The last time I spoke with him, one week before he was killed, he told me he had a mission. His killing was not the act of a lone madman. In February of 2001, Pim announced that he wanted to change the first article of the Dutch constitution, on discrimination, because in his view it kills freedom of expression, and he was right. The following day in the Dutch churches, which are mostly empty and used for public meetings, the diary of Anne Frank was read as a warning against Fortuyn. Pim was truly Catholic, more than we think, in his books he spoke out against modern society without fathers, without values, empty, nihilist."

Chris Ripke is a well-known artist in the city. His studio is near a mosque in Insuindestraat. Shocked in 2004 by the murder of director Theo Van Gogh by an Dutch Islamist, Chris decided to paint an angel on wall of his studio and the biblical commandment "Gij zult niet doden," thou shalt not kill. His neighbors at the mosque found the words "offensive," and called the mayor of Rotterdam at the time, the liberal Ivo Opstelten. The mayor ordered the police to erase the painting, because it was "racist." Wim Nottroth, a television journalist, camped out on the spot in protest. The police arrested him, and his film was destroyed. Ephimenco did the same in his own window: "I put up a big white sheet with the biblical commandment. Photographers came, and the radio. If you can no longer write 'do not kill' in this country, then you are saying that we are all in prison. It is like apartheid, whites living with whites and blacks with blacks. There is a great chill. Islamism wants to change the structure of the country." For Ephimenco, part of the problem is the de-Christianization of society. "When I arrived here, during the 1960's, religion was dying, a unique event in Europe, a collective de-Christianization. Then the Muslims brought religion back to the center of social life. Aided by the anti-Christian elite."

Let's go for a stroll through the Islamized neighborhoods. In Oude Westen there are only Arabs, women clothed from head to foot, ethnic foods shops, Islamic restaurants, and shopping centers with Arabic music. "Ten years ago, you didn't see all these headscarves," Ephimenco says. Behind his house, in a flourishing middle class area with two-story houses, there is an Islamized neighborhood. There are Muslim signs everywhere. "Look at all of those Turkish flags, over there is an important church, but it's empty, no one goes there anymore." In the middle of one square stands a mosque with Arabic writing outside. "That used to be a church." Not far from here is the most beautiful monument in Rotterdam. It is a small granite statue of Pim Fortuyn. Beneath the gleaming bronze head, the mouth saying his last words on behalf of freedom of speech, there is written in Latin: "Loquendi libertatem custodiamus," let us safeguard the right to speak. Every day, someone places flowers there.

Sono pazzi questi Inglesi. 2

Il giudice più anziano (e per questo forse un po’ rincoglionito)*1 del Regno Unito ha recentemente affermato che ai musulmani britannici dovrebbe essere concesso il diritto di utilizzare i regolamenti della Shar’ia. In seguito si è parzialmente corretto (bontà sua), precisando che il permesso non sarebbe valido per i reati penali o per quei fatti non contemplati dal diritto inglese e che invece per l’Islam sono reato.
In soldoni, Lord Phillips avverte che il taglio delle mani ai ladruncoli o la lapidazione delle donne e degli uomini adulteri continuerebbe a non essere realizzabile nel Regno Unito (almeno per i primi anni…. ndF).
Insomma, si dovrebbe far ricorso alla legge islamica per risolvere controversie maritali (chissà come saranno contente le donne e le bambine musulmane) e finanziarie.

Il parere espresso dal giudice è che la Shar'ia è vittima di una ingiusta e diffusa incomprensione e che potrebbe svolgere comunque un suo ruolo nel sistema legale britannico.

L’intervento avalla il giudizio espresso tempo fa dall’Arcivescovo di Canterbury. Secondo Lord Phillips, il prelato intendeva soltanto affermare che i musulmani nel regno Unito potrebbero vivere seguendo i principi della legge coranica, ma senza per questo entrare in conflitto con i diritti garantiti dalla legge britannica.

Se le farneticazioni dei rinco inglesi saranno realizzate in un prossimo futuro, è probabile che poco più tardi accada anche ciò che ha illustrato Fjordman nell’articolo postato sotto.

Mmmm….Bravi Inglesi, continuate così. Siete sulla strada giusta!

Nell’articolo pubblicato dal Telegraph troverete anche le reazioni all'intervento del giudice inglese.

"Sono Pazzi questi Inglesi" Altro post dedicato alle follie britanniche.

*1- a parte la facile battuta, Lord Phillips è il giudice "Senior", Procuratore Generale del Regno

Sono pazzi questi Inglesi!

Ma sono veramente folli questi inglesi.

Non cercano di arrestare il flusso migratorio degli islamici, anzi incoraggiano i musulmani ad entrare nel Regno Unito e a sentirsi come a casa loro.

L’arcivescovo di Canterbury ritiene che sia inevitabile introdurre alcuni aspetti della Sharia nel sistema giuridico britannico(d’altra parte le Corti islamiche sono presenti nel Regno Unito da più di venti anni).

Il NTU (National Union of Teachers) fa pressioni sul Governo affinché prenda le parti dei palestinesi, si batte per l'insegnamento della storia della Palestina in funzione anti-israeliana e nel contempo richiede che il Corano diventi materia di studio negli istituti scolastici (con degli Imam come insegnanti).

Il Labour party, consapevole che togliere il Natale dal calendario inglese è (per ora) ancora improponibile, richiede che la sua importanza venga ridimensionata e portata al livello di altre feste e celebrazioni religiose (islamiche). Ciò per favorire le relazioni tra razze e religioni diverse.

Un appunto, alcuni manifestanti che (giustamente) contestavano le idee “multiculturali” del Vescovo di Canterbury sono finiti in manette.
Che avranno fatto a quelle zecche islamiche che nelle manifestazioni a Londra gridavano “ Bomb UK! Bomb USA!”? Secondo me non hanno fatto proprio nulla Un video QUI.

Vi auguro di non andare in Gran Bretagna con il vostro animale di compagnia, rischiereste di vederlo trattenuto in quarantena per 6 mesi. Certo, gli inglesi temono che le nostre bestiole portino chissà quali epidemie nella loro isola. Intanto la Gran Bretagna è zeppa di bestie fondamentaliste il cui intento è demolire le basi della nostra cultura occidentale per sostituirle con le loro. E’ questo il virus che sta attecchendo nel Regno Unito (ed in altri Paesi europei). E tanti occidentali accecati dalla falsa luce del multiculturalismo, ne sono gli inconsapevoli veicoli.

Gran Bretagna, Belgio, Svezia, Francia, Bosnia…. l’avanzata dell’Islam pare inarrestabile. Per ora gli effetti dell’immigrazione musulmana non sono percepibili a tutti, ma esistono e sono devastanti. La mia opinione è che non possiamo fermarci a guardare il lento declino dell’Europa, o a registrarne solamente gli effetti. Occorre dire basta a tutto ciò ed essere pronti a combattere in ogni modo per debellare il cancro che può portare all’estinzione della nostra civiltà.

Leggi anche Londonistan, Corti e leggi islamiche. Allarme in Inghilterra

Di seguito un articolo tratto da UP POMPEII

CHRISTIAN GREAT BRITAIN WILL SOON BE OBLITERATED BY MUSLIM IMMIGRATION & GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION

Whereas the numbers of British attending their Christian churches has undoubtedly declined in recent years--one cannot be so blind as to discount the effects of the rabid encouragement of rampant muslim immigration, by our Government in its efforts to obtain a "multicultural" UK, is fast leading to the Islamisation and de- Christianisation of our country.
Taking that into account - as well as the dhimmi attitude of even the top Anglican cleric - the Archbishop of Canturbury, Rowan Williams, whose own defeatest attitude toward the muslim invasion of Great Britain was shown loudly and clearly in his recent statement that called for accomodation of Sharia Law in the UK. Fortunately Dr. Williams was pilloried for his comments - and just this past Easter Sunday - two men interrupted Rowan's Easter sermon by holding placards bearing the words "Support the persecuted church" and "No to Sharia law". They were promptly arrested but not until after their point had been made. Dr Williams adjusted his sermon to rebut their claims and ask for prayers for persecuted Christians. Perhaps he should have been specifically praying for the disappearance of Christian mores and customs in our very own Britain.
Even the teacher's union - the National Union of Teachers (NUT) has recently voted to take an anti British military and pro Palestine (anti Israel) stance and want to have imams teach the Koran in British state schools. Is this any wonder when NuLabour wants to remove any national or local celebrations of Christmas and other Christian holidays?:

---------------"Christmas should be downgraded in favour of festivals from other religions to improve race relations, says an explosive report.

Labour's favourite think-tank says that because it would be hard to "expunge" Christmas from the national calendar, 'even-handedness' means public organisations must start giving other religions equal footing. " ------link to this article is here---------------

This leads me back to my original premise - the eradication of our Christian heritage and mores from Great Britain has less to do with church attendance than it does with the government intentionally undermining Christianity and by its support of increased muslim immigration and subsequent ongoing Islamisation of the UK.

Posted by The Opinionator

Siamo certi di voler accettare tutto questo senza reagire?