Chi sono veramente i Fratelli Musulmani

Riporto da Informazione Corretta l'articolo di Dimitri Buffa. Consiglio di leggere anche il pezzo di Tarek Heggy "The Reality of the Muslim Brotherhood"

“Ci prenderemo questo Paese da loro usando la democrazia che hanno ricevuto dal diavolo”.
I fratelli mussulmani dicono quello che poi fanno. Come lo diceva un Hitler ancora sconosciuto e sottovalutato quando organizzava il putsch della birreria nel 1923 e in seguito quando in carcere meditava il “Mein Kampf”.
Da mercoledì sera, dopo avere visto il documentario sui “muslim brothers”, fatto in Norvegia da un musulmano moderato di origine egiziana, lo sappiamo anche noi. Lo abbiamo visto alla Camera insieme a Souad Sbai, che ha organizzato il tutto, e al grande pensatore laico egiziano, Tarek Heggy, che ha commentato le immagini, e alla ricercatrice e d esperta di arabo e di islam Valentina Colombo. Ospiti nel pubblico i musulmani moderati d’Italia, cioè quelli che non prendono ordini dal network dei fratelli mussulmani. E che non vanno mai in tv a provocare. E che non hanno bisogno di dissimulare le proprie sembianze e di vestirsi da bravi ragazzi per farsi accettare. Che non si comportano insomma come i Tariq Ramadan de noantri. E che non hanno paura a dire, come ha detto, dopo la proiezione del filmato Gamal Bouchaib, che “per gli immigrati di fede islamica in Italia il più grande problema, dopo la predicazione estremista nelle moschee fai da te, sono i convertiti italiani”. Spesso provenienti da militanze nei movimenti antagonisti della sinistra rivoluzionaria degli anni ’70. O in quelli della destra neo nazista. Gente che ha abbracciato l’islam appunto dei fratelli musulmani per continuare la lotta al sistema. “Gente che ha risposte per tutto come i marxisti leninisti”, per citare le parole di Tarek Heggy, e che ha “un cervello che ragiona per slogan e per schemi”. Anche se poi i fratelli mussulmani considerano le persone di sinistra il loro nemico ancora di più che la democrazia. Si badi bene: questo non è il solito discorso identitario del cacio cavallo alla Pera. Qui c’è di mezzo un problema concreto: evitare che questa gente rivendichi come ha già fatto, e ottenuto, in Inghilterra, di potere applicare nei propri ghetti la legge shar’iatica.
Prendiamo qualche passo dalla traduzione italiana del filmato, è la voce narrante di uno degli autori che ci guida: “Kamil Al Najjar vive a Londra e conosce i Fratelli Musulmani meglio di molti altri. Era un membro dell’organizzazione nella sua patria. Come disertore, è minacciato di morte e non può rivelare il suo volto. Parla di Hassan al Banna che ha fondato i Fratelli Musulmani in Egitto nel 1928. Ha trasformato l’Islam da religione a ideologia politica. Oggi i Fratelli sono considerati come la più grande organizzazione islamica nel mondo. Al Najjar dice che hanno un’agenda per l’Europa. Un’agenda segreta”.
In Francia come spiega il filmato “l’agenda è già operativa”. “Lafif Lakhdar è tunisino e mi spiega che in Francia le famiglie musulmane con molti figli non sono in grado di portare tutti ad avere un’educazione. I giovani finiscono per essere disoccupati”. I Fratelli Musulmani hanno predicatori che girano tutta la Francia. Forniscono il servizio porta a porta in tutte le famiglie mussulmane. Dicono ai giovani che potranno sposare più di una donna. La poligamia è proibita secondo la legge francese, ma loro gli montano la testa e suggeriscono il trucco che pare si faccia anche in Italia nelle “moschee fai da te” del nord: “Sposa una donna pubblicamente secondo la legge francese e poi potrai sposare più donne nella Moschea”.
I fratelli mussulmani hanno due facce. Quella buona la usano per le interviste a “Limes”, come quella pubblicata su internet a Mohammad Mahdi Akef, ex mursid , o “Guida suprema della Fratellanza musulmana”. Quella cattiva la rivelano loro malgrado nel documentario in cui quello stesso personaggio ammette che quando si parla di diritti umani non sono inclusi quelli delle donne che vanno in giro seminude o degli omosessuali.
La Sbai è l’unica politica in Italia che, a costo di vivere sempre sotto potezione, ha il coraggio di portare in giro filmati come questo. Così come la Fiamma Nirenstein è l’unica a difendere sempre e comunque Israele dalle calunnie del politically correct, di destra o di sinistra che siano.
Ma siccome la madre di coloro che dialogano con i propri carnefici è sempre incinta, ci piace concludere questo articolo con la voce del giovane Gamal Bouchaib, uno dei rappresentanti dell’islam moderato in Italia, sempre poco ascoltato dalle nostre istituzioni, centrali o locali che siano. “Noi veri musulmani moderati (o sei musulmano o non lo sei ndF), a differenza di altri sciacalli che attendono la morte per nutrirsi, non vogliamo che si abbassi la guardia nei confronti dell’integralismo islamico. Perché chi cerca di creare un dialogo con il diavolo prima o poi si brucia all’inferno ..e bisogna volere essere ciechi non vedere che l’estremismo è già tornato in Egitto nella figura di Al Qaradawi “. L’imam urlante di Al Jazeera e di tutti i fratelli mussulmani del mondo. Curiosità finale: Gamal Al Banna, fratello del fondatore Hasan, ancora vive. Ed è un nemico della setta fondata dal fratello. Nel filmato fa vedere una foto di sua sorella degli anni ’50 e dice: “all’epoca il velo non lo portava nessuno ed eravamo tutti mussulmani osservanti, i fratelli musulmani hanno semplicemente trasformato la religione in un’ideologia oppressiva”.

"Tariq Ramadan is the fox..."
"Are we still willing to defend the freedom?"

Non diamo spazio agli imbecilli.

Diciamolo, provo un malcelato disprezzo (e disgusto) per quel branco di imbecilli che in Italia (dell'Europa parleremo dopo) accusano il governo di xenofobia e razzismo perché, con ritardo, ha deciso di avvalersi di alcuni provvedimenti diretti ad impedire che il nostro Paese venga invaso da migliaia e migliaia di immigranti clandestini.

Il fastidio aumenta in modo preoccupante, quando ascolto o leggo le dichiarazioni di quei coglioni che, convinti che la stragrande maggioranza degli italiani sia composta da poveri fessi, insistono su alcune tesi decisamente discutibili.

Esempio:

• LORO - tra i clandestini che rifiutiamo vi sono di certo delle menti eccelse che potrebbero essere indispensabili per l'Italia;
• FOSCA - ma come no? Tuttavia fino ad ora pare che nessun genio sia ancora approdato sulle nostre coste. Per contro, il Capo della Polizia afferma che la percentuale dei clandestini che incorre in reati vari parte dal 60% ed arriva fino all'80% in certe zone del Paese, ma c'è di più: a fronte di un 7% di popolazione straniera in Italia, il 38% dei detenuti nelle carceri italiane è costituito da immigrati, mentre è del 40% (quarantapercento) la percentuale delle violenze sulle donne commesse da stranieri-
• LORO -non ospitando quei clandestini li condanniamo alla morte (questa è di 2 giorni fa);
  
• FOSCA - che schifo! Come al solito, questa sinistra bugiarda e ipocrita si avvale di mezzucci vergognosi per raggiungere i suoi obbiettivi, ulteriori commenti sono inutili.
  
• LORO - viviamo già in una società multiculturale e la molteplicità delle culture rappresenta un valore che ci arricchisce.
• FOSCA - un valore che ci arricchisce? magari fosse così. Ma guardiamo in faccia la realtà: gli immigrati che provengono dai Paesi di religione islamica sono pregni di quella cultura barbara, retrograda che impedisce loro di accettare la nostra moderna, laica cultura liberale. Pensate forse che quei popoli così diversi dal nostro, che vivono osservando precetti e principi che noi abbiamo cancellato da secoli, abbiano qualcosa da insegnare? Io non lo credo. Tuttavia, non mi aspetto che gli immigrati contribuiscano allo sviluppo della nostra civiltà, ma pretendo che rispettino i valori fondamentali del Paese che li ospita. Pretendo che gli immigrati si integrino completamente nella nostra società e diventino italiani a tutti gli effetti (come sono diventati argentini, australiani, americani, i nostri emigranti.) Purtroppo, causa la loro "islamicità", questa è e sarà sempre una realtà inattuabile.
  
• Per contro, gli immigranti non musulmani, pur non apportando altro valore aggiunto che la loro volontà di realizzarsi nel lavoro, possono integrarsi completamente nel tessuto civile e sociale del nostro Paese, ma spetta a noi aiutarli in questo processo.
  
• Ne riparleremo, magari con riferimento all'immigrazione romena.
  

In alcuni sfortunati Paesi europei, gli imbecilli multiculturalisti colleghi di quelli italiani, hanno avuto il campo libero, favorendo in un primo tempo l'immigrazione dei popoli di origine musulmana, quindi assecondando le loro assurde pretese . Ora i loro concittadini ne subiscono le conseguenze e, a mio parere, muoiono dalla voglia di ringraziarli.

Speriamo che il nostro governo prosegua sul cammino della continenza del fenomeno dell'immigrazione che comunque dovrà essere necessariamente legata alla certa integrazione degli stranieri nella società italiana. Nel contempo si comprenda che l'immigrazione dei popoli musulmani deve essere fermata, prima che sia troppo tardi.

Di seguito posto un articolo di Giulio Meotti già riportato da Liberali per Israele, ma per gli amici stranieri, questa volta in lingua inglese.

In the casbah of Rotterdam

by Giulio Meotti


In Feyenoord, veiled women can be seen everywhere, darting like a flash through the streets of the neighborhood. They avoid any sort of contact, even eye contact, especially with men. Feyenoord is the size of a city, and there are seventy nationalities coexisting there. It is an area that lives on subsidies and residential construction, and it is here that it is most obvious that Holland – with all of its rules against discrimination and all of its moral indignation – is a completely segregated society. Rotterdam is new, having been bombed twice by the Luftwaffe during the second world war. Like Amsterdam, it is below sea level, but unlike the capital it does not enjoy an image of reckless abandon. In Rotterdam, it is the Arab shops selling halal food that dominate the cityscape, not the neon lights of the prostitutes. Everywhere are casbah-cafes, travel agencies offering flights to Rabat and Casablanca, posters expressing solidarity with Hamas, or offering affordable Dutch language lessons.

It is the second-largest city in the country, a poor city, but also the economic engine with its huge port, the most important in Europe. Most of the population are immigrants, and the city has the tallest and most imposing mosque in Europe. Sixty percent of the foreigners who arrive in Holland come here to live. The most striking thing when one arrives in the city by train are the enormous and fascinating mosques framed by the vibrant green, luxuriant, wooded, watery countryside, like an alien presence compared to the rest. They call it "Eurabia." The Turkish Mevlana mosque is imposing. It has the tallest minarets in Europe, even higher than the stadium of the Feyenoord soccer team.

Many of the neighborhoods in Rotterdam are captive to the darkest, most violent form of Islamism. Pim Fortuyn's house stands out like a pearl in a sea of chador and niqab. It is at number 11 Burgerplein, behind the train station. Every now and then someone comes to put flowers in front of the home of the professor who was murdered in Amsterdam on May 6, 2002. Someone else leaves a card: "In Holland everything is tolerated, except for the truth." A millionaire named Chris Tummesen bought Pim Fortuyn's house so that it would remain intact. The evening before his murder Pim was nervous, and had said on television that a climate of demonization had been created against him and his ideas. And his fears came true, when he was shot in the head five times by Volkert van der Graaf, a militant of the animal rights left, scrawny, head shaved, eyes dark, dressed like an environmental purist in a handmade shirt, sandals, and goat's wool socks, a strict vegetarian, "a guy impatient to change the world," his friends say.

Not long ago in downtown Rotterdam, funerary photos of Geert Wilders were placed under a tree, with a candle to commemorate his upcoming death. Today Wilders is the most popular politician in the city. He is the heir of Fortuyn, the homosexual, Catholic, ex-Markist professor who had formed his own party to save the country from Islamization. At his funeral, only the absence of Queen Beatrice kept the farewell to the "divine Pim" from becoming a funeral fit for a king. Before his death they made a monster of him (one Dutch minister called him an "untermensch," an inferior man in Nazi parlance), afterward they idolized him. The prostitutes of Amsterdam left a wreath of flowers in his honor beneath the National Monument in Dam Square, a memorial to the victims of World War II.

Three months ago, "The Economist," a weekly publication far from Wilders' anti-Islamic ideas, spoke of Rotterdam as a "Eurabian nightmare." For most of the Dutch who live there, Islamism is now a threat greater than the Delta Plan, the complicated system of dikes that prevents flooding from the sea, like the flood in 1953 that killed two thousand people. The picturesque town of Schiedam, part of the greater Rotterdam area, has always been a jewel in the Dutch imagination. Then the fairy tale glow faded, when in the newspapers three years ago it became the city of Farid A., the Islamist who made death threats against Wilders and Somali dissident Ayaan Hirsi Ali. For six years, Wilders has lived under 24-hour police protection.

Muslim lawyers in Rotterdam also want to change the rules of the courtroom, asking to be allowed to remain seated when the judge enters. They recognize Allah alone. The lawyer Mohammed Enait recently refused to stand when the magistrates enter the courtroom, saying that "Islam teaches that all men are equal." The court of Rotterdam has recognized Enait's right to remain seated: "There is no legal obligation requiring Muslim lawyers to stand in front of the court, insofar as this action is in contrast with the dictates of the Islamic faith." Enait, the head of the legal office Jairam Advocaten, has explained that "he considers all men equal, and does not acknowledge any form of deference toward anyone." All men, but not all women. Enait is well known for his refusal to shake hands with women, and has repeatedly said he would prefer them to wear the burqa. And there are many burqas on the streets of Rotterdam.

The fact that Eurabia has arrived in Rotterdam has been demonstrated by an episode in April at the Zuidplein Theatre, one of the most prestigious in the city, a modernist theater proud of "representing the cultural diversity of Rotterdam." It is located in the southern part of the city, and receives funding from the municipality, headed by a Muslim, the son of the imam Ahmed Aboutaleb. Three weeks ago, the Zuidplein Theatre allowed an entire balcony to be reserved for women only, in the name of sharia. This is not happening in Pakistan or in Saudi Arabia, but in the city from which the Founding Fathers set out for the United States. It was from here that the Puritans disembarked in the Speedwell, which they later exchanged for the Mayflower. This is where the American adventure began. Today, it has legalized sharia.

For a performance by the Muslim Salaheddine Benchikhi, the Zuidplein Theatre agreed to his request to have the first five rows set aside for women only. Salaheddine, an editorialist for the website Morokko.nl, is known for his opposition to the integration of Muslims. The city council has approved this: "According to our Western values, the freedom to live one's own life by virtue of one's convictions is a precious possession." A spokesman for the theater has also defended the director: "It is hard to get Muslims to come to the theater, so we are willing to adapt."

Another man who has been willing to adapt is the director Gerrit Timmers. His words are fairly symptomatic of what Wilders calls "self-Islamization." The first case of self-censorship took place in Rotterdam, in December of 2000. Timmers, the director of the theater group Onafhankelijk Toneel, wanted to stage a performance about the life of Mohammed's wife Aisha. The play was boycotted by the Muslim actors in the company when it became evident that it would be a target for the Islamists. "We are enthusiastic about the play, but fear reigns," the actors told him. The composer, Najib Cherradi, said that he would withdraw "for the good of my daughter." The newspaper "Handelsblad" gave the story the title "Tehran on the Meuse," the name of the gentle river that passes through Rotterdam. "I had already done three works about the Moroccans, so I wanted to have Muslim actors and singers," Timmers tells us. "Then they told me that it was a dangerous issue, and they could not participate, because they had received death threats. In Rabat, an article came out saying we would end up like Salman Rushdie. For me, it was more important to continue the dialogue with the Moroccans, rather than provoke them. For this reason, I see no problem if the Muslims want to separate the men from the women in a theater."

Let's meet the director who has brought sharia to the Dutch theaters, Salaheddine Benchikhi. He is young, modern, confident, and speaks perfect English. "I defend the decision to separate the men from the women, because here there is freedom of expression and organization. If people can't sit where they want to, that is discrimination. There are two million Muslims in Holland, and they want our tradition to become public, everything is evolving. Mayor Aboutaleb has supported me."

One year ago, the city was buzzing when the newspapers published a letter by Bouchra Ismaili, a Rotterdam city councilman: "Listen up, crazy freaks, we're here to stay. You're the foreigners here, with Allah on my side I'm not afraid of anything. Take my advice: convert to Islam, and you will find peace." Just a walk through the streets of the city, and you know right away that in many neighborhoods you are no longer in Holland. It is right out of the Middle East. In some schools, there is a "room of silence" where Muslim students, who are in the majority, can pray five times a day, with a poster of Mecca, the Qur'an, and a ritual washing before the prayers. Another Muslim city councilman, Brahim Bourzik, wants signs placed in various parts of the city showing the direction to Mecca.

Sylvain Ephimenco is a Franco-Dutch journalist who has been living in Rotterdam for twelve years. For twenty years, he was the "Libération" correspondent in Holland, and is proud of his leftist credentials. "Even though I don't believe in that anymore," he says, welcoming us to his home overlooking one of Rotterdam's little canals. Not far from here is the al Nasr mosque of the imam Khalil al Moumni, who when gay marriage was legalized described homosexuals as "sick people worse than pigs." From the outside, it can be seen that the mosque is more than twenty years old, having been built by the first Moroccan immigrants. Moumni has written a pamphlet that is circulating around the Dutch mosques, "The path of the Muslim," in which he explains that the heads of homosexuals should be cut off and "hung from the highest building in the city." Next to the al Nasr mosque, we sit down at a cafe for men only. In front of us is a halal Islamic slaughterhouse. Ephimenco is the author of three essays on Holland and Islam, and today is a famous columnist for the leftist Christian newspaper "Trouw." He has the best perspective for understanding a city that, perhaps even more than Amsterdam, embodies the tragedy of Holland.

"It is not at all true that Wilders gets his votes from the fringes, everyone knows that, even though they don't say it," he tells us. "Today educated people vote for Wilders, although at first it was the lower class Dutch, the tattoo crowd. Many academics and people on the left vote for him. The problem is all of these Islamic headscarves. There's a supermarket behind my house. When I arrived, there wasn't a single headscarf. Now it's all Muslim women with the chador at the register. Wilders is not Haider. His positions are on the right, but also on the left, he's a typical Dutchman. Here there are even hours at the swimming pool set aside for Muslim women. This is the origin of the vote for Wilders. Islamization, this foolishness with the theater, has to be stopped. In Utrecht, there is a mosque where they provide separate city services for men and women. The Dutch are afraid. Wilders is against the Frankenstein of multiculturalism. I, who used to be on the left but am no longer anything, I say we've reached the limit. I feel the ideals of the Enlightenment have been betrayed with this voluntary apartheid, in my heart I feel the death of the ideals of the equality of men and women, and freedom of expression. Here the left is conformist, and the right has the better answer to insane multiculturalism."

One of the professors at Erasmus University in Rotterdam is Tariq Ramadan, the famous Swiss Islamic scholar who is also a special adviser for the city. Some of Ramadan's statements against homosexuality were uncovered by Holland's most famous gay magazine, "Gay Krant," directed by a talkative journalist named Henk Krol. On a videocassette, Ramadan calls homosexuality "a disease, a disorder, an imbalance." On the tape, Ramadan also has comments on women, "they should keep their eyes on the ground when they're on the street." Wilders' party asked for the city council to be disbanded, and for the Islamic scholar from Geneva to be sent packing, but instead he was renewed in his post for two more years. This was happening while across the sea, the Obama administration was confirming the ban on Ramadan entering United States territory. The tapes in Krol's possession include one in which Ramadan tells women: "Allah has an important rule: if you try to attract attention through the use of perfume, or your appearance or gestures, you do not have the correct spiritual orientation."

"When Pim Fortuyn was killed, it was a shock for everyone, because a man was murdered for what he said," Krol tells us. "That was no longer my country. I'm still thinking about leaving Holland, but where can I go? Here we have been criticized by everyone, by the Catholic Church and by the Protestants. But when we criticized Islam, they answered us: you are creating new enemies!" According to Ephimenco, the street is the secret of Wilders' success: "In Rotterdam, there are three enormous mosques, one of them is the largest in Europe. There are more and more Islamic headscarves, and an Islamist impulse coming from the mosques. I know many people who have left the city center to go to the rich, white suburbs. My neighborhood is poor and black. It is a question of identity, on the streets Dutch is not spoken anymore, but Arabic and Turkish."

Let's meet the man who inherited Fortuyn's column in the newspaper "Elsevier." His name is Bart Jan Spruyt, a robust young Protestant intellectual, founder of the Edmund Burke Society, but above all the author of Wilders' "Declaration of independence," and his coworker from the beginning. "Here an immigrant no longer has to struggle, study, work, he can live at the expense of the state," Spruyt tells us. "We have ended up creating a parallel society. The Muslims are in the majority in many neighborhoods, and are asking for sharia. This isn't Holland anymore. Our use of freedom has turned back against us, it is a process of self-Islamization."

Spruyt was one of Fortuyn's close friends. "Pim said what the people had known for decades." He attacked the establishment and the journalists. It was a great relief for the people when he went into politics, they called him the 'white knight'. The last time I spoke with him, one week before he was killed, he told me he had a mission. His killing was not the act of a lone madman. In February of 2001, Pim announced that he wanted to change the first article of the Dutch constitution, on discrimination, because in his view it kills freedom of expression, and he was right. The following day in the Dutch churches, which are mostly empty and used for public meetings, the diary of Anne Frank was read as a warning against Fortuyn. Pim was truly Catholic, more than we think, in his books he spoke out against modern society without fathers, without values, empty, nihilist."

Chris Ripke is a well-known artist in the city. His studio is near a mosque in Insuindestraat. Shocked in 2004 by the murder of director Theo Van Gogh by an Dutch Islamist, Chris decided to paint an angel on wall of his studio and the biblical commandment "Gij zult niet doden," thou shalt not kill. His neighbors at the mosque found the words "offensive," and called the mayor of Rotterdam at the time, the liberal Ivo Opstelten. The mayor ordered the police to erase the painting, because it was "racist." Wim Nottroth, a television journalist, camped out on the spot in protest. The police arrested him, and his film was destroyed. Ephimenco did the same in his own window: "I put up a big white sheet with the biblical commandment. Photographers came, and the radio. If you can no longer write 'do not kill' in this country, then you are saying that we are all in prison. It is like apartheid, whites living with whites and blacks with blacks. There is a great chill. Islamism wants to change the structure of the country." For Ephimenco, part of the problem is the de-Christianization of society. "When I arrived here, during the 1960's, religion was dying, a unique event in Europe, a collective de-Christianization. Then the Muslims brought religion back to the center of social life. Aided by the anti-Christian elite."

Let's go for a stroll through the Islamized neighborhoods. In Oude Westen there are only Arabs, women clothed from head to foot, ethnic foods shops, Islamic restaurants, and shopping centers with Arabic music. "Ten years ago, you didn't see all these headscarves," Ephimenco says. Behind his house, in a flourishing middle class area with two-story houses, there is an Islamized neighborhood. There are Muslim signs everywhere. "Look at all of those Turkish flags, over there is an important church, but it's empty, no one goes there anymore." In the middle of one square stands a mosque with Arabic writing outside. "That used to be a church." Not far from here is the most beautiful monument in Rotterdam. It is a small granite statue of Pim Fortuyn. Beneath the gleaming bronze head, the mouth saying his last words on behalf of freedom of speech, there is written in Latin: "Loquendi libertatem custodiamus," let us safeguard the right to speak. Every day, someone places flowers there.

Ghufoor Butt ovvero: i nuovi passi della Norvegia verso l'integrazione con l'ISLAM

La Norvegia ha vinto l’Eurofestival? Forse è una delle poche cose di cui può ancora gioire. Come tanti Paesi europei corrotti da tempo dalla “political correctness”, sta faticando non poco nel tentativo di integrarsi completamente con i suoi invasori maomettani. Certamente avrà un valido aiuto da Ghufoor Butt, il norvergese-pakistano creatore dell’ Independent Labour Party che aspira ad entrare in Parlamento con i tanti voti degli immigrati musulmani. Butt si batte affinché alle donne poliziotto di religione musulmana sia imposto l’obbligo del Hijab; affinché in Norvegia vi siano corsi di madre lingua pakistana e scuole ed ospedali islamici; affinché i viaggi aerei da Oslo a Karachi siano sempre “low cost” e venga semplificata la procedura di immigrazione per i popoli di religione musulmana.

Ad onor del vero la proposta del Hijab* per le donne poliziotto musulmane era stata presentata in Parlamento con l’avvallo di nientepopodimeno che Knut Storberget, ministro della Polizia e della Giustizia del governo laburista, poi si sa come vanno queste cose: i dannati, reazionari partiti dell’opposizione tanto hanno fatto che il buon ministro Storbeget ha dovuto ritirarla. Ma Butt non si scompone, quando sarà in Parlamento la riproporrà, insieme a decine di altre proposte che nei suoi sogni beduini, porteranno la Norvegia a diventare il primo Paese europeo perfettamente islamico.

Di seguito posto un articolo da Gates of Vienna che riporta e commenta una intervista del giornale DagBladet al musulmano Butt.
Nell’occasione mi associo anch’io a Dymphna nell’augurare alla Norvegia una buona festa per l'anniversario della sua Costituzione. Ed è vero, quale miglior modo per festeggiarla che postare l’intervista al maomettano??

“Without Pork and Alcohol, Norwegians are the World's Best Muslims”

by Dymphna

A couple of weeks ago, the Baron sent off a request to one of our volunteer translators to have her account in English of a news report from the Norwegian newspaper, Dagbladet.

His email got misplaced but the translator found it today and went to work on the article. I just got the finished product a little while ago.

For all I know, the Baron gave up and got another translation, so this story could already have been posted. But even if this is a repeat, it couldn’t have come at a more appropriate moment: May 17th is Norwegian Constitution Day.

What better way to celebrate than to ponder the ideas of one Ghufoor Butt.

Ghufoor Butt (no, I’m not making that up) is forming the ILP, which he explains in this interview. What intrigues me about this man is his artlessness. I can’t think of a better word to describe his frank opinions and his fearlessness in uttering them. The man has chutzpah to spare.

He says:

The new party will prohibit homosexual practices and lower gasoline prices. “In about three years will the mayor of Oslo be a Norwegian-Pakistani,” says Ghufoor Butt.

One has to admire such stunningly misplaced confidence.

“If Norwegians had not drunk alcohol, had sex before marriage and eaten pork, they would have been the world’s best Muslims. They are honest, not criminals, and love peace,” said Ghufoor Butt .

Butt is the leader of the newly-established party, the Independent Labor Party (ILP), and the leading candidate for the party in this year’s parliamentary elections.

Right. Norwegians would make great Muslims. After all, they have that long tradition of arranged marriages and honor killings. Not to mention their well-known tribal internecine warfare.

What is this fellow drinking?
- - - - - - - - -

Independent Labor

Dagbladet: You are not afraid that people will mistake you with the Labor Party?

Butt: “No one has objected yet. We are a party for everyone that works, including immigrants. Therefore, we have an international name,” said Butt, who himself moved to Norway in 1974. He does not understand why some Norwegians feel threatened by Islam.

Maybe Fjordman could have a chat with him, get Mr. Butt up to speed on why “some Norwegians” feel threatened by Islam.

“That we do not have sex before marriage or drink alcohol is not a threat to Norway. Muslims love Norway, and many have switched their citizenship to be Norwegian. We are no threat,” says Butt.

No threat at all…except to young Norwegian women and Norwegian culture in general.

Bollywood Star

Today Butt is “world-famous” in the Norwegian-Pakistani community. He has played in twenty Pakistani films, is still a big name in Pakistan and was a well-known Pakistani political journalist. In Norway, he is best known for having a hunger strike against the high airline prices between Norway and Pakistan in 2006.

Today he runs, among other things, a movie store in Grønland [now an immigrant neighborhood in Oslo] that sells Bollywood movies. He also directs and produces films, the last, “Mukhtaran May”, he produced in 2002.

On April 28, Butt travels to Pakistan to launch the new Norwegian party.

“There I shall appear on two Pakistani TV channels, GEO and ARY, to talk about the new party,” says Butt.

Dagbladet: Isn’t it strange to launch a Norwegian party in Pakistan?

Butt: No. Most Norwegian-Pakistanis watch these two TV channels. So if we are to reach them, these are important channels,” says Butt.

Dagbladet: Are you betting only in Norwegian-Pakistani votes?

Butt: No. We have four Norwegian candidates and we would like also that ethnic Norwegians should vote for us..

No alcohol? Muslims’ treatment of women? This guy is sure an optimist. He’s also clueless. Someone give him a clue and a clue bag. Please…or maybe just hit him over the head with a pork chop.

Frp [Progress Party] for immigrants

In many ways, Butt’s new party is similar to the Progress Party. They want lower gasoline prices, the elimination of tolls, and impose lower taxes.

“We are one of the world’s richest countries. So, I do not understand how it is possible to have such expensive gasoline,” says Butt. He believes that the Progress Party has done little to achieve this.

“If they really fought for lower gasoline prices and for the removal of tolls, they would have had these by now. I promise to fight harder,” says Butt.

Fighting “harder” is not the same as fighting smarter and that’s seems to be Mr. Butt’s problem (not counting his name).

Will have open borders

Although Butt shares the Progress Party’s views on low gasoline prices and tolls, he has diametrically opposite views on the integration debate. The party wants to make family reunification easier, and will provide automatic Norwegian visas to anyone who marries a Norwegian citizen. They want to remove the requirement that one must earn over NOK 270,000 ($41,300) a year to bring a new spouse to the country.

“This is unfair to young Norwegian-Pakistani that are starting-up,” says Butt.

In addition, he wants to provide mandatory bilingual education to the six largest immigrant groups in Norway, and that all religious leaders such as imams and priests should receive state pay.

“When you see how little money many mosques have, it is necessary to help them pay for the imam,” says Butt.

Call Saudi Arabia, Mr. Butt. They will send you a few trunk loads of petrodollars. After all, that’s what they’ve done in your native country.

Would prohibit Muhammed drawings

The party is not as tolerant towards others. When it comes to the Muhammed-drawings and gays Butt replied, “cards and cash”

[Translator: I’m not sure what that idiom means -- something like “with both barrels” maybe?].

Dagbladet:What are your views on the Muhammed caricatures?

Butt:”This has nothing to do with freedom of speech. We can not allow the mockery of religions, such as Muhammed-drawings,” says Butt.

Dagbladet:Should those that published the Muhammed-drawings in Norway be punished?

Butt: Yes, they must be punished.

Butt will also prohibit homosexual practice.

“It should not be lawful for gays to marry,” says Butt.

Monday Butt phoned back. He wanted to emphasize that homosexual practice is forbidden under Islam and that it is the religion that is against gay practice, not the party.

“We do not want to change Norwegian law,” says Butt.

What a wonderful example of taqiyya. “We don’t want to change Norwegian law, we just want to obliterate it and substitute sharia. So what’s the problem? Norwegians make great Muslims, right?”

American Osama bin Laden

The 63-year-old is critical of the U.S. war on terror, and put the question of Western media portrayals of Osama bin Laden.

“Who has served in the terror with Osama bin Laden? It is notMuslims. In Islam it is illegal to practice/work with terror,” says Butt. He believes the U.S. is behind most of the terror in the world.

“How is it possible that they have not managed to capture Osama bin Laden. Either he doesn’t exist, or he worked for the U.S. and lives there now,” says Butt.

If it is illegal for Muslims to be terrorists, then all those jihadists must be little twinkle fairies, phantasms made up by the Zionist press. Yeah, that’s it: jihadists are Jews in disguise, trying to make innocent Muslims look bad.

“The Jews were perhaps behind”

The Norwegian-Pakistani [Butt] is also skeptical of the official version of the terrorist attack September 11, 2001.

“Where were the Jews? And how many were killed? These are questions I think, today, that we do not have answers for,” said Butt, who believe the Israeli intelligence service Mossad may have been behind the attack.

“The United States has not answered the big questions. Who was behind the attack? There is also a big question how many Jews died? This we do not know today,” says Butt.

Dagbladet: Are you anti-semitic?

Butt: I have nothing against the Jewish people, but I believe it must be able to ask these questions.

Dagbladet: Many will interpret this as hatred against Jews.

Butt:It is not true. I am against what the Jewish people do to the Palestinians, but I am not against the Jewish people.

“Mossad was behind 9/11”. Of course. Why didn’t we think of that before? Mr. Butt certainly has a knack for clarification.

Soldier as youth

As a youth, Butt participated as a soldier in the war between India and Pakistan in September 1965. Today he wants to pull Norway out of the war in Afghanistan.

“Norway has no business in Afghanistan, and one of the party’s most important issues is to stop the Norwegian military presence in the country. Norway is a land of peace. It should not look at what the U.S. does when it comes to Afghanistan and Iraq,” says Butt.

The politician thinks Norway should support Pakistan in Kashmir-dispute with India.

“Norway should support Kashmir’s independence,” says Butt.

Hmm…that’s a diplomatic decision he won't see anytime soon.

Will have Norwegian Pakistani Prime Minister

Minority politicians stood in 1995 and 2007 with their own list to the council elections in Oslo, with no luck. Butt still believes they [i.e., his new party] will succeed where others have failed.

“I have a lot behind me to achieve this. I think people trust me,” says Butt.

In the fall he hopes for a seat in Parliament. But it does not stop there.

“My hope is that in about fifteen years in Norway, like the United States see a second-generation immigrant in the job of prime minister,” says Butt. Also at the [Oslo] council election in three years, the 63-year-old hope for a “break election”.

“I think the Mayor of Oslo in three years will be a Norwegian-Pakistani,” says the Norwegian-Pakistani.

Well. This dude has a lot of opinions and high hopes. But, you know, he could be right about one thing: Osama bin Laden is in the U.S. I think I know where he is, too: the transgendered ObL is now Nancy Pelosi and s/he’s sitting in the American House of Representatives, big as life. She’s certainly no crazier than Mr. Butt.

Happy May 17th, Norway! May you continue to enjoy the spoutings of Norwegian Ghufoor Butt.

* Con Hijab o senza, il poliziotto donna non conta nulla per I musulmani. Difatti in Norvegia il Consiglio Islamico (IRN) per parola del suo imam Ahmed Ismaili ha dichiarato che un uomo non può essere arrestato da una donna, in quanto non vi possono essere contatti tra i due sessi al di fuori dei normali rapporti familiari. Auspico che le poliziotte musulmane o non, per obbedire a questo precetto, sparino direttamente ai rei maomettani colti in flagranza di reato (fonte Islam in Europe).

Eurofestival 2009

Pur risiedendo in Italia, la gran parte dell’anno la passo all’estero, nell’est dell’Europa. In dettaglio, viaggio spesso in alcuni dei Paesi che fanno parte o sono lambiti da quella che viene comunemente chiamata la Penisola Balcanica.
Ebbene se vivi nei Balcani, ti senti quasi obbligato a guardare e commentare l’Eurofestival, il festival della canzone europea, al quale partecipa la maggioranza dei Paesi dell’est, dell’ovest e Israele, ma non l’Italia.
Lo scorso anno la competizione canora ebbe luogo a Belgrado e fu vinta dalla Russia con la canzone Believe di Jim Beanz e Dima Bilan, in quell’occasione pubblicai il video di Laka con la canzone Pokušaj! per il semplice fatto che mi piaceva molto.
Ieri alla finale tenuta a Mosca, ha vinto la Norvegia con il cantante/violinista Rybak di origini bielorusse. Mi piace e pubblico il video.

Ho apprezzato anche altre canzoni in gara, ad esempio quelle presentate dall'Estonia, dalla Turchia e dall'Armenia.
Coinvolgente la performance dell'Ucraina.

Ho già scritto che l'Italia non partecipa a questa competizione. Forse qualcuno è convinto che siamo più adatti ad un Festival della canzone araba...

In Europa è Jihad. Parte II

Oslo, abitanti 580.000. A dicembre 2006 300 casi di stupro denunciati.

Nella Norvegia dei fiordi e delle “stavkirker”, le chiese lignee inserite nell’elenco dei patrimoni dell’umanità, la capitale Oslo ha un triste primato: il rapporto popolazione percentuale di crimini contro le donne è il più alto d’Europa: come se a Roma, città di più di 2.800.000 abitanti, ci fossero quattro denuncie per stupro ogni giorno. 1)
Ovviamente ci riferiamo ai soli reati denunciati.

In sei anni, i reati di stupro nella sola città di Oslo sono quasi triplicati. AftenPosten del settembre 2001 ci informa che 111 sono gli stupri compiuti nell’anno precedente, di cui 72 commessi da cittadini “non occidentali”, 25 commessi da cittadini norvegesi o "occidentali", mentre 14 sono classificati come commessi da individui di etnia sconosciuta.
Non è un caso se ci riferiamo al 2001 perché, sebbene alcune organizzazioni musulmane, dopo l'uscita della statistica delle etnie coinvolte nei reati di stupro, abbiano fortemente condannato la violenza dei loro stessi fratelli (nuovi immigrati e giovani della seconda e terza generazione d’immigranti), promuovendo anche manifestazioni di piazza e dibattiti all’Università, tutto questo sembra essere dimenticato solo pochi anni dopo. Nel senso che le violenze contro le donne aumentano in modo vertiginoso, ma le statistiche scompaiono.
O meglio, non sono più ufficiali: la politica, in nome di una vagheggiata società moderna multiculturale, cerca di contrastare la discussione, viva in questi anni in Norvegia, che ha come oggetto la violenza sessuale come fenomeno peculiare ad una parte non minoritaria dell’immigrazione musulmana. A mio avviso, questa sorta di censura ha il suo apice nella legge contro la discriminazione, dell’aprile del 2005.
Chiunque non potrebbe che approvare una legge che sanzioni duramente il razzismo. Tuttavia, già la sua impostazione offre dei motivi di dissenso. Difatti, in soldoni, si afferma che qualunque cittadino norvegese sospettato di discriminazione razziale o religiosa “ è colpevole fino a che non dimostri la propria innocenza”.
Fjordman si chiede (ed io pure) come sia possibile che il diritto acquisito di qualsiasi individuo del mondo occidentale, ossia risultare innocente finché non venga provato il suo coinvolgimento in un reato, possa in questo caso e solo in questo, essere stravolto. In ogni modo la legge è passata. E le statistiche, come già detto, sono magicamente scomparse. Inoltre, pare che nei quotidiani casi di stupro raccontati dalla stampa norvegese, difficilmente appaia il nome dei rei, se identificati dalla polizia, e tantomeno siano segnalate le loro etnie e le religioni di appartenenza. - a meno che non vi sia un identikit certo.

Si può essere scettici sul fatto che esista un odio profondo di una parte degli immigrati musulmani verso il popolo norvegese. Eppure sembra sia così.
Un solo esempio: durante una partita di calcio finita male (disordini, feriti ecc. ecc) i giocatori curdi di una delle squadre in campo, il Djerv, hanno intimidito alcuni spettatori con la minaccia della decapitazione, minacciando pure di stupro tre ragazze (la più giovane aveva 11 anni).
Una stupida partita di calcio della categoria dilettanti, trasformata in un megafono per il nuovo Jihad. Incredibile?
E in Svezia? Peggio!
Fonti: Fjordman, Aftenposten leggi anche Femina Novo
per la foto: Conflict

1) Un corollario: i casi di stupro sono così frequenti in questi ultimi anni, che si impostano anche cause e dibattiti sui problemi ( e sulle ingiustizie) del risarcimento dovuto alle vittime. leggi

Continua